532
« on: August 27, 2007, 05:27:56 PM »
Like I said, it is indeed one-sided, but he makes a few good points.
Personally, I hope it scares enough people into at least thinking a bit more about energy consumption and recycling. I doubt anyone will argue that those two are not a good idea.
My official stance is that I just don't know (seeing as no scientist have proven or disproven the hypothesis) if the rise in global temperatures is caused by human intervention, or simply the natural fluctuations of the earth.
I would say that I'm an environmentalist, but nowhere near Greenpeace level (an organization with good intentions, but god awful execution IMO). What gets me going is people who completely disregard pollution (or any kind) as a problem - especially considering that we have the technology to almost remove it completely if enough money was invested.
What also gets me going is the oil industry, and their numerous attempts to stop hydrogen cars (and similar initiatives).
The demon on my other shoulder laughs at hydrogen cars, which some people seem to consider the solution to all pollution problems.
I'd prefer a vegetable oil fueled car over the hydrogen car any day.
"But the hydrogen car is zero-emission"
True, but the energy used to make the hydrogen must still come from conventional power plants - i.e. coal for the most part. That means that the hydrogen car itself it non-polluting, but in practice, it just pollutes somewhere else.
The vegetable oil-fueled car sends out as much CO2 as a normal diesel car (well.. close to anyway), but as the plants used to produce the oil absorbed the CO2 during growth, it remains CO2-neutral to the environment.
As such, I don't see a reason for hydrogen cars yet. When all our energy comes from clean sources such as windmills, hydro-power plants or some day hopefully nuclear fusion, we can take up the idea again.
All in all, I just think it is so easy for us to cut down on pollution, that I just don't see any reason not to.