You know what? I support the Scotish independence thing, if they would be so kind as to make one little change...
Could this new independent country take most of the north of England with it? London is practically where everything that tax money is heavily invested in get's built, most of that money is from the northern regions and it's made inaccessible to them. To get down to London it would take 2 hours from where I live which might not sound a lot but when you think about it, it would take me 2 hours to fly to France on a plane! (I'm not including the time it takes to board the plane first and get my luggage at the other end here but hell I can imagine that would only add another hour or two).
My point is London may as well be a separate country if you live above a certain line in England then you may as well be in another country all together. Even with travel sorted, say if I want to visit a gallery or something, by the time news gets to the area that they are showing the paintings of X artist in Y gallery, even if you immediately get on the internet to book a ticket it will be booked out. This is because it's advertised for months on underground adverts and local advertisements there, so everyone is going to book there first.
Every holiday is hosted in London The olympics, the royal wedding and the diamond "Jew belly"... wait... why do I care about this again?
The fact of the matter is that not only do they not care but they actually enjoy the idea that they are "superior" which to me is stupid (and it gives the whole Pride of Britain nationalistic er... bounder a thing for their money too.
So... yeah I'd like to see how the south gets on without the north... they will do so well without factories, land, the ports (if Liverpool is part of the deal) and the money our cities make. Yeah let's see how far they get without that...